A US federal appeals court overturns the majority of ex-President Donald Trumps IEEPA tariffs as illegally imposed, with a ripple effect across international trade and economic policy.

US Court Rules Against IEEPA Tariffs

A US federal circuit court on Friday invalidated in part a series of tariffs created under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) by the executive of former President Donald Trump. The verdict specified most of these import taxes as unlawful, thus revoking a major part of Trump’s economic plan.

As described here, the IEEPA (International Emergency Economic Powers Act), the law passed in 1977, gives the president the power to halt or regulate trade with any country under the condition of an emergency declaration. By contrast, the court held that most of the tariffs imposed during the Trump era exceeded the limits set out in the law.

Background on IEEPA and Trump-Era Tariffs

Trump used the IEEPA to back up tariffs against multiple global imports and, in this way, guarded the domestic industries and countered the alleged unfair trade practices. Besides China, the tariff plan included Mexico and Canada as well as specific impositions on steel, aluminum, and other raw materials that these countries produce.

Several lawyers observed that although the law gives the president emergency powers, it does not expressly sanction comprehensive trade restrictions, leaving the door open for lawsuits. Hogan Lovell’s partner and ex-Trump administration economic policy adviser Kelly Ann Shaw, said that the IEEPA was first and foremost a sanctioning and export control tool, not an instrument for broadly taxing imports.

Implications for US Trade and Businesses

The court’s decision will influence US trade policies right away. Affected by the Trump-era tariffs and obliged to pay more for their imports, companies may now be permitted to take advantage of this ruling to lower costs they pass on to their clients and increase their profits.

What can be accrued from this court decision is that current negotiations may benefit from it and the government’s use of emergency powers in the future will be different. The uncertainty of IEEPA tariffs was a major anxiety factor for those in the production and retail businesses, shaky supply chains being their main concern. This is where most of them are expected to breathe a sigh of relief.

Also Read: India Faces Impact of 50 Percent Tariff in Global Trade

Mixed Reactions from Industry Experts

Some industry specialists posit that the verdict has re-established the balance of power and the judiciary role as one of the checks and balances, whereas others caution that the ruling will still be followed by unstable trade policy. “The ruling brings to light the need for Congress to oversee financial decisions in the economy,” stated Dr. Laura Michaels, a trade policy analyst.

On the other hand, global trading allies will now view the matter differently as the redrawing of bilateral trade pacts and dialogues in the wake of the decision is highly probable considering their long-standing objection to the tariffs as extreme and unilaterally implemented.

Notable Instances and People

Shengjia Zhao and other AI and tech resources were not a part of this lawsuit but have been among those affected by trade restriction policies in the past, which is a clear example of the interaction of technology, innovation, and trade policy.

This judgment might act as precedent enough to distinguish other court actions challenging tariffs and trade measures under IEEPA, thus hinting at a possible halt on the US unilateral economic sanctions and restrictions.

Offense Grounds of IEEPA Tariffs

The court maintained that IEEPA is a legislative act that restricts the President from drastically setting tariffs beyond what the law allows. The judges’ opinion centered on and stressed the importance of solid legislative instructions and pointed out that evading Congress’s authority is a violation of the separation of powers principle.

Academicians in law comment that this conception might be a barrier for future officials of administrations to exercise the IEEPA for wide-ranging economic decisions without explicit Congressional consent.

Next Scenario After Court Decision

Markets sideways took to the news. According to their point of view, the fall of IEEPA tariffs would be a good starting point for the rise of the import of products at a cheaper price, which would be a win-win for both the industrial and consumer sectors. Nevertheless, the uncertainty about forthcoming trade policy still shadows the scene with the risk of slow-moving investment strategies.

FAQs

READ MORE ON

Read the full article here: IEEPA Tariffs Challenge Ends in Court Win — For more updates, visit Wittiya – Top Business News, Stock Market Insights & Financial Updates (Wittiya).

The Reserve Bank of India has issued a warning that the uncertainty about U.S. tariffs could lead to a decline in demand for India even after the easing of the inflation trend and an upgrade of the sovereign rating by S&P, which indicates a positive inflow of capital.

India Tariff Risk Outlook

In its August bulletin, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) pointed out that the ambiguity in US tariff policies continues to present a major risk on the downside to India’s overall demand outlook. The statement comes when India is generally showing better inflation trends and has got a rating upgrade from the international rating agency S&P.

The bulletin also indicated that the present trajectory of inflation may be less severe than expected initially. However, if there were to be prohibitive tariffs, for instance, the US administration’s 50% levy on Indian products, the resultant export restriction would have a ripple effect on manufacturing and economic activities in general.

Tariff Pressures and India’s Demand Risks

Faced with supply chain issues that have already imposed heavy burdens on the Indian economy, the country is now dealing with more risks related to tariff moves in the US. It is expected that these tariff measures will slow India’s exports, make it less competitive, and reduce the profits of corporate firms in trade-sensitive sectors.

The RBI has been cautionary in tone about how these events may lead to a decrease in the folium demand in India. Given that India’s growth model has been predicated on external trade performance, falling exports over a prolonged time will have a knock-on effect on employment creation and the capital expenditure cycle.

Sovereign Rating Upgrade Brings Relief

The credit prospects of India has been turned for the better following the good news when S&P has upgraded the sovereign rating for India. This change is predicted to facilitate inflows of capital, lower the costs of borrowing, and keep the yield on government bonds rising at stable levels. The capital coming in this way may provide a cushion against the strong winds of tariffs in the coming period.

Experts in the capital markets are of the view that a good foremost sovereign performance would act as a magnet for direct housing inflows as well as foreign portfolio in turn eventually putting against leaving India’s macro-stability amidst external trade challenges.

Also Read: Sensex Rises 450 Pts Amid Tariff Jitters

Inflation and Rural Growth Outlook

Even though it is still a problem, the RBI bulletin made it very clear that the inflationary pressure now facing is much less than before. We can expect a rabi crop that would be of good quality since the rainfall has been normal and the temperature conducive. Besides, the rise in real rural wages would add to the purchasing power of the rural economy of India and hence act as a buffer to the domestic demand.

The central bank has also stated that the consumption in the rural areas supported by the stability of agriculture is the lifeline for the Indian growth that is showing resilience. In the event that food inflation keeps moderating, it is envisaged that the overall inflation will be of manageable levels thus giving flexible policy for the RBI.

Policy Balance Ahead

Tariff risk and rating support are two major factors that have an impact on India’s complex economic outlook. The question is how policy makers who are expected to juggle global trade pressures with the domestic growth imperative will do this. Analysts suggest that while a sovereign rating can give a country a buffer, a US policy of high tariffs might still be able to reduce India’s growth rate in the long term.

The RBI bulletin reports that the emphasis of policy in India should continue to be on supporting domestic demand, at the same time maintaining structural reforms to enhance competitiveness and productivity.

FAQ’s

READ MORE ON

Read the full article here: India Tariff Uncertainties – Risk to Market Demand — For more updates, visit Wittiya – Top Business News, Stock Market Insights & Financial Updates (Wittiya).

The United States has decided to put a 50% tariff on Indian products, this action will cause a domino effect on exports, GDP forecasts, and trade relations. The Indian government characterizes the step as unjust and is devising counter measures to soften the blow.

50% Tariffs Hit Indian Exports

The United States has imposed a 50% tariff on Indian products that will be in effect from August 27 if New Delhi does not manage to agree with Washington before the expiration of the deadline. The act is likely to lead to a decrease in Indian exports to the US amounting to billions of dollars, which will, in turn, complicate the bilateral trade relations and present new obstacles for the Indian government.

Tariff Breakdown and Timeline

From August 7, a 25% reciprocal tariff had already been in place, with an additional 25% punitive measure on Russian oil imports, which was to start from August 27. The president of the US, Donald Trump, signed the relevant tariff order earlier this month, while the US Department of Homeland Security officially announced it on August 26.

Labour-intensive sectors, such as textile, apparels, and leather industry, are anticipated to be the biggest losers of this market access, which, in their turn, jeopardize the employment and the exporting capabilities in international markets.

Also Read: Indian Exporters Hit Hard as U.S. Retailers Abruptly Halt Orders

Exemptions to Cushion the Blow

There are some sectors that are not hit by the tariffs. The exemptions also include goods that are already on the way to their destinations, humanitarian supplies, drugs and pharmaceuticals, as well as electronic goods like mobile phones and semiconductors.

India’s Reaction

New Delhi has termed the tariffs “unfair, unjustified, and unreasonable,” accusing the West of double standards over Russian oil imports. Prime Minister Narendra Modi stated, “We will not compromise on the interests of farmers, cattle-rearers, and small-scale industries.”

The decision has soured bilateral relations, with India leaning closer to China and Russia to open new trade avenues. Reports also highlight India’s plan to diversify export destinations and reduce dependency on the US market.

Trade Talks in Limbo

Six rounds of trade talks between India and the US have failed to break the deadlock, with the latest round scheduled for August 25 postponed indefinitely. Both nations recently held a virtual meeting to stress commitment to long-term ties, but tariffs remain a sticking point.

GDP Impact and Forecasts

S&P Global expects India’s GDP growth to remain resilient, projecting 6.5% growth in FY26, as exports contribute just 2% to the country’s GDP. Exemptions on electronics and pharmaceuticals provide further cushion.

However, a Moneycontrol poll of economists predicts GDP growth in the first quarter of FY26 will fall to 6.6% from 7.4% in the previous quarter, signaling near-term risks.

Also Read: ICRA Predicts 6.5%+ GDP Growth for India in FY26

Expert Commentary

Mark Linscott of The Asia Group warned the standoff has converted a “win-win” into a “lose-lose” situation for both nations. Partner Nisha Biswal added that the 50% tariffs would price Indian textiles and garments out of the US market, undermining India’s role in the global “China+1” supply chain strategy.

India’s Mitigation Strategies

The Indian government is reportedly preparing a relief scheme for exporters while cutting GST rates to support businesses. It is also exploring opportunities in Russia and easing trade frictions with China to secure alternative markets.

FAQ’s

Read the full article here: India Faces Impact of 50%Tariff in Global Trade — For more updates, visit Wittiya – Top Business News, Stock Market Insights & Financial Updates (Wittiya).

Nissan shares fall over 6% as Mercedes-Benz exits 3.8% stake amid restructuring, tariffs, and EV competition.

Shares of Nissan Motor, one of Japan’s top car-makers, dropped more than 6% on Tuesday after the pension fund of Mercedes-Benz announced plans to sell the 3.8% stake it held in the company, worth about $346 million.

Initially, Nissan’s shares that are listed in Tokyo decreased by 6.7% before cutting the losses and trading at a level about 6% lower. The decision to divest comes as the automaker deals with internal problems, such as declining sales, tariffs in the US, and the shift that is taking place in the industry toward EVs. In addition, the competition from Chinese manufacturers in this sector is fierce.

Nissan’s second-largest shareholder after Renault was the one who commented on the matter the most. The parent company of Mercedes-Benz, holding 3.8% in the Japanese automaker, said the sale of the shares was a step towards cleaning the portfolio, emphasizing that the shares held in the pension trust since 2016 were not of strategic use. Of the total volume of shares, 2.7% were accounted for by Mercedes-Benz, while the share of Daimler Truck was almost 93%.

The disposal puts more pressure on Nissan, which is facing a lot of challenges:

• In May 2025, the company made known its intentions to eliminate 11,000 work positions and close seven factories as stage one of a major restructuring plan.
• Negotiations between Honda and Nissan for the creation of the world’s third-largest automaker were temporarily suspended in February 2025.
• The tariffs that had been imposed at 25% were later brought down to 15% in July 2025, thus giving only a little elbow room to the Japanese car industry.

Nissan CEO Ivan Espinosa has stated over and over that the company should concentrate first of all on stabilizing operations and then on making the transition to EV profitable. Despite all the efforts, Nissan’s shares have dropped by more than 29% since the beginning of the year which can be interpreted as a sign of caution on the part of investors given the situation in the sector as a whole.

READ MORE ON

Read the full article here: Nissan Shares Plunge 6% Following Mercedes-Benz Stake Sale — For more updates, visit Wittiya – Top Business News, Stock Market Insights & Financial Updates (Wittiya).

The U.S. has declared that there will be an extra 25 % tariff on products from India which will come into force on August 27 meaning the total tariffs will be 50%. The action, that is linked to India’s imports of oil from Russia, has unsettled the markets and elicited the reaction from officials in New Delhi without delay.

The United States has taken a step closer to enforcing trade policies against India by the Department of Homeland Security which has come up with a draft notice to confirm that an extra tariff of 25% shall be levied on Indian products starting from August 27, 2025. This move follows President Donald Trump’s earlier call to throttle up tariffs, sending a clear message of the administration’s hardline attitude in trade and energy-related negotiations with India.

The draft notification says that the tariffs will target Indian goods “entered for consumption, or withdrawn from the warehouse for consumption” on or after the date of effect. The notification arrives a few weeks after Trump’s proclamation about the rising tariffs linking the measure directly to India’s refusal to stop importing Russian oil.

In his earlier statement, Trump spoke about raising tariffs on Indian imports twice, i.e. to 50% while also maintaining the original baseline tariff at 25%. Introducing a 21-day negotiation period, the administration suggested that New Delhi was still able to reach a deal, especially around the energy trade policies.

Also Read: US Scraps India Trade Talks Days Before Tariffs Hit

Deeper Financial and Trade Implications

According to trade specialists, the moment of this tariff hike may impact India’s export competitiveness deeply and spread widely, especially in such areas as textiles, machinery, auto components, and chemicals. The higher tariffs may somewhat cut India’s competitive advantage in the US market; hence the Indian exporters might strategize their supply chain and choose different markets.

From the US point of view, the tariffs are considered and marketed as a means of supporting local industries and pressurizing the trading partners on the issues of strategic importance. On the other hand, economists predict the alternative view that such tariffs will raise the costs of manufacturers in the US who depend on intermediates goods from India. The consumers may then find that the increased costs of products are transferred to them in industries ranging from clothing to household goods.

The correlation between trade tariffs and India’s energy purchases adds yet another aspect to the situation. By forcing India to reject Russian oil imports, the Trump administration is seeking to connect trade actions with wider geopolitical and energy security aims. This shows a change in the manner Washington is applying tariffs—not only as an economic tool, but as a strategic instrument in foreign policy.

Market Outlook

The decision is also being announced at a time when global equity markets are feeling the effects of the geopolitical uncertainties. The analysts’ view is that volatility will be very strong in the Indian export-oriented stocks, particularly in the sectors which are heavily dependent on the US market. The currency market may also move, whereby the Indian rupee may come under pressure if the exports have a downward trend for quite some time.

On the other hand, the trade officials and industry players have a different opinion that the ongoing negotiations could still provide a cushion in the event that India agrees to import partially from Russia or embarks on a phase-wise compliance journey. Meanwhile, the businesses on both sides of the trade corridor face a lot of uncertainties.

READ MORE ON

Read the full article here: U.S. Moves to Add 25% Tariff on Indian Goods, Draft Notice Confirms — For more updates, visit Wittiya – Top Business News, Stock Market Insights & Financial Updates (Wittiya).

The United States has postponed its trade delegation’s visit to India, originally scheduled for August 25–29, amid rising tariff tensions. Talks on a bilateral trade agreement are expected to be rescheduled, with agriculture and dairy market access remaining contentious issues.

Amid rising trade tensions, the United States has called off its planned visit to India for the next round of bilateral trade negotiations that was scheduled between August 25 and 29. Sources indicate the talks will likely be rescheduled, but the timing is uncertain as both nations grapple with heightened tariff measures.

This round of negotiations would have marked the sixth in a series of talks aimed at shaping a comprehensive trade agreement between India and the United States. The cancellation comes at a sensitive time, with the United States announcing an additional 25% tariff on Indian goods linked to Russian oil imports, adding to earlier duties of the same magnitude. The extra tariff is set to take effect on August 27, which made these talks strategically important.

Also Read: US Tariff Threats Put EU-India Trade Deal on the Clock

One of the key sticking points in the trade discussions has been the United States’ demand for wider market access in India’s agriculture and dairy sectors. India, however, has maintained that such a move could severely affect the livelihoods of small and marginal farmers and is also influenced by cultural and religious sensitivities regarding milk imports. Prime Minister Narendra Modi, in his recent Independence Day address, emphasized strong support for farmers, fishermen, and livestock rearers, underscoring that India will not compromise on policies that could harm its rural economy.

The delay in talks also intersects with broader geopolitical developments. Markets had anticipated that discussions between global powers on the Ukraine conflict might ease the tariff burden on India, but uncertainties remain. While the United States has left open the possibility of easing or escalating tariffs depending on global oil dynamics, businesses in both countries now face prolonged uncertainty in trade flows, especially in agriculture, dairy, and energy-linked sectors.

Also Read: Markets Rattle: Indian Stocks Crash Under Trump’s New Tariff

Analysts suggest that the pause could push back the timeline for finalizing the trade agreement, initially targeted for the September–October period. For India, this delay increases the urgency of strengthening domestic resilience through its “swadeshi” push, while for the United States, the leverage of tariffs appears aimed at accelerating concessions. The financial implications of delayed negotiations could include disruptions in supply chains, higher costs for importers, and slower progress toward a balanced trade framework.

READ MORE ON

Read the full article here: US Scraps India Trade Talks Days Before Tariffs Hit — For more updates, visit Wittiya – Top Business News, Stock Market Insights & Financial Updates (Wittiya).

Oil prices slipped ahead of the Trump-Putin Alaska summit, with Brent and WTI declining. The market awaits potential easing of Russia sanctions while China’s refinery throughput and exports show year-on-year growth, highlighting complex global energy dynamics.

Global oil prices declined on Friday as traders awaited the high-profile summit between U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska. Brent crude futures fell 89 cents, or 1.3%, to $65.95 a barrel by 1315 GMT, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude futures dropped 97 cents, or 1.5%, to $62.99 a barrel.

The market is closely watching whether the talks could ease sanctions imposed on Russia over the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. Analysts suggest that any hint of a ceasefire or diplomatic breakthrough may trigger renewed optimism in the oil market. Conversely, unresolved tensions could maintain price volatility.

Meanwhile, Chinese refineries reported an 8.9% year-on-year increase in throughput in July, although it was slightly lower than June levels, which marked the highest throughput since September 2023. Chinese oil product exports also rose from a year ago, indicating strong global demand despite recent production adjustments.

Also Read: Indian Oil Stock Declines Before Quarterly Results

Experts note that fluctuations in oil prices remain sensitive to geopolitical developments, U.S.-Russia relations, and China’s refining output. Traders are balancing these factors alongside market speculation about potential sanction relaxations or shifts in energy demand.

The oil market continues to reflect the complex interplay of geopolitical uncertainty and global energy supply-demand dynamics, highlighting the need for investors and policymakers to monitor developments in real time.

READ MORE ON

Read the full article here: Oil Prices Dip Ahead of Trump-Putin Summit in Alaska — For more updates, visit Wittiya – Top Business News, Stock Market Insights & Financial Updates (Wittiya).

India is grappling with a strategic trade challenge following the US’s imposition of steep, country-specific tariffs. The nation must weigh negotiation, retaliation, market diversification, or trade concessions, each carrying complex economic implications, according to GTRI.

India is facing a critical juncture in its trade strategy after the United States imposed steep tariffs on Indian exports. The Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) highlighted that these measures, including a 50% country-specific tariff on many Indian goods atop existing Most Favoured Nation (MFN) duties, present both economic and diplomatic challenges for the country.

Experts indicate that India has several options. It can engage in direct negotiations with the US to seek tariff relief or retaliate with reciprocal duties on American imports. Alternatively, India may diversify its export markets, focusing on Asia, Europe, and Africa, or offer targeted trade concessions, such as ending Russian oil imports, to ease tensions. Each option carries a distinct risk-reward profile affecting trade balances, energy security, and geopolitical positioning.

Also Read: Manufacturers Brace for Crisis: 50% U.S. Tariff Hits Hard

GTRI notes that India’s Independence Day this year is overshadowed by the ongoing trade confrontation, which could have lasting consequences for sectors heavily dependent on US demand, including textiles, agriculture, and manufactured goods. Analysts stress that careful calibration of policy responses will be crucial to maintain economic stability and avoid long-term disruptions in export revenues.

From a financial perspective, the tariffs are likely to affect India’s export-led growth, foreign exchange inflows, and industry earnings. Companies with significant exposure to the US market may need to hedge risks, adjust supply chains, or explore alternative markets to sustain profitability. Additionally, the move signals a broader recalibration of global trade priorities, with India seeking to protect domestic industries while remaining competitive internationally.

GTRI emphasizes that proactive engagement, policy agility, and strategic diversification will be key to mitigating the impact of these tariffs while leveraging new opportunities in global trade. India’s policymakers must carefully balance immediate economic pressures with long-term trade and diplomatic objectives.

READ MORE ON

Read the full article here: Understanding India’s Options in Response to US Tariffs — For more updates, visit Wittiya – Top Business News, Stock Market Insights & Financial Updates (Wittiya).

India faces a major economic challenge as US tariffs on imports from the country rise to 50%. The move threatens Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s decade-long manufacturing push, putting pressure on exporters and raising concerns about India’s global trade competitiveness.

India’s manufacturing ambitions face a major setback as the United States raises tariffs on imports from the country to 50%. The decision creates uncertainty for exporters and risks undermining India’s global trade position at a time when Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s administration has been pushing hard to make India a global manufacturing hub.

One of the biggest concerns comes from Farida Group, India’s largest shoemaker, which had already secured 150 acres in Tamil Nadu to expand its export operations. Company executives now warn that such high tariffs erode competitiveness, leaving little room for pricing adjustments or negotiations with international buyers.

Also Read: India Falls From Top to Least Favored Asian Market Amid Tariffs

Industry leaders estimate that exporters could see demand fall by as much as 20% in the short term. This is particularly critical as India continues to promote itself as an alternative to China in global supply chains. The sudden policy shift in Washington threatens to stall this momentum and force companies to reconsider investment plans.

Trade experts argue that while India’s long-term fundamentals remain strong, the tariff shock exposes vulnerabilities in its export-driven sectors such as footwear, textiles, and industrial goods. Unlike a 25% tariff where companies can negotiate margins, a 50% rate eliminates profit buffers, creating deeper uncertainty for businesses operating in global markets.

Analysts suggest that India may need to accelerate trade diversification, strengthen domestic demand, and push for strategic bilateral agreements to cushion the blow. The tariff move also underscores the urgent need for India’s manufacturing sector to upgrade competitiveness through innovation, cost efficiency, and supply chain resilience.

With India seeking to position itself as a global production hub, the rising trade barriers highlight the delicate balance between protectionism abroad and industrial ambitions at home.

READ MORE ON

Read the full article here: Manufacturers Brace for Crisis: 50% U.S. Tariff Hits Hard — For more updates, visit Wittiya – Top Business News, Stock Market Insights & Financial Updates (Wittiya).

China’s economy slowed in July 2025, with retail sales, industrial output, and fixed-asset investment missing forecasts. Weak domestic demand, a slump in property investment, and extreme weather weighed on growth, raising concerns over Beijing’s 5% full-year target.

China’s economy showed fresh signs of strain in July 2025, as multiple growth indicators fell short of expectations, raising concerns about the country’s ability to sustain its annual growth target of 5%.

Data from the National Bureau of Statistics revealed that retail sales grew just 3.7% year-over-year in July, well below the 4.6% expected and slowing from June’s 4.8%. The weak consumer spending highlights persistent domestic demand challenges, despite earlier government efforts to stimulate consumption.

Meanwhile, industrial output rose 5.7% from a year earlier, marking its slowest pace since November last year. Analysts had expected closer to 5.9%, reflecting how external headwinds and domestic policy constraints are curbing factory activity.

Also Read: China’s Bond Market Cracks Under the Weight of Equity Fever

Investment activity also softened. Fixed-asset investment expanded only 1.6% in the January–July period, compared to forecasts of 2.7%. Within that, property investment contracted sharply by 12%, worsening from earlier months. The property sector, once a key growth driver, continues to drag overall momentum, with developers facing weak demand and limited financing access.

Extreme weather added further strain. Record-high temperatures, heavy rains, and flooding disrupted factory operations and construction activity across multiple regions. These climate-related shocks compound structural challenges, leaving industries vulnerable to volatility.

Despite these headwinds, China’s economy expanded 5.3% in the first half of the year, keeping it broadly aligned with Beijing’s annual target. However, economists caution that the fading effects of government stimulus and pre-emptive trade gains may weigh more heavily in the second half.

The government has also maintained policies to rein in excessive industrial capacity, particularly in steel and coal. While these measures are aimed at stabilizing long-term growth and profitability, they are contributing to a near-term slowdown.

Unemployment trends provide further warning signs. The urban jobless rate edged up to 5.2% in July from 5% in the prior months, while youth unemployment excluding students remains above 14%, reflecting persistent labor market stress.

With risks of undershooting the 5% growth target mounting, markets will watch closely for fresh policy support in the coming months. A balanced approach between stimulus and structural reform will be critical in determining whether China can stabilize growth while avoiding financial imbalances.

READ MORE ON

Read the full article here: China’s Economic Momentum Weakens in July with Missed Forecasts — For more updates, visit Wittiya – Top Business News, Stock Market Insights & Financial Updates (Wittiya).